Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Sam Harris on Ayn Rand

Sam Harris vs Ayn Rand 

Sam Harris

Okay, next question, given the popularity of Ayn Rand on the right can you give your best refutation of Objectivism?

Sam Harris

Well, you know, I haven't spent a lot of time reading Rand. I found her novel more or less unreadable and I've read some of her essays. I've read some of her interviews.

My basic issue with her ethics is that she seemed not to understand that pro-social emotions like compassion were a real source of well-being even for quote selfish people.

The stark opposition between selfishness that she thought was rational and altruism that she thought was delusional or masochistic that I think is psychologically untrue and ethically unhelpful.

I think a wisely selfish person more and more begins to recognize that he or she is committed to the happiness of other people and is right to be that their happiness redounds to his own happiness that is a more mature a more enlightened form of ethics than any I've ever heard Rand espouse.

It is also more enlightened and mature than attend to fans of Rand espouse so whatever Rand herself believed those who are drawn to her philosophy often strike me as malignantly selfish and un-illumined by a larger picture of just how good life could become right if we also saw that we were in this together.

Bertrand Russell on Karl Marx

 The video and the transcript.

Bertrand Russell talked about Marx in 1952 interviewed

Interviewer:

Lord Russell, speaking as of today, can you see the influence of any one Philosophers more than any other one?

Bertrand Russell:

Well, I suppose in recent years the most important influence has been Marx. If you can dignify him with the name of philosopher, I should hardly like to dignify him so myself, but I suppose he must count in the list. And he certainly has had more influence than anybody else.

Interviewer:

For those of us who reject Marx, can you offer any positive philosophy to help us toward a more hopeful future?

Bertrand Russell:

Well, less to that. You see, I think one of the troubles of the world has been the habit of dogmatically believing in something or other. And I think all these matters are full of doubt. And the rational man will not be too sure that he's right. I think that we ought always to entertain our opinions with some measure of doubt. I shouldn't wish people dogmatically to believe in any philosophy. Not even mine. Not even mine.

No, I think we should accept our philosophies with a measure of doubt. What I do think is this that if a philosophy is to bring happiness, it should be inspired by kindly feeling. Now Marx is not inspired by kindly feeling. Marx pretended that he wanted the happiness of the proletariat. What he really wanted was the unhappiness of bourgeoise. And it was because of that negative element, because of that hate element that his philosophy produced disaster. A philosophy which is to do good must be one inspired by kindly feeling and not by unkindly feeling.